?

Log in

No account? Create an account
   Journal    Friends    Archive    Profile    Memories
 

2007 "Spider-Man" should not conclude the franchise - CinemaDave

May. 5th, 2007 10:10 pm 2007 "Spider-Man" should not conclude the franchise

“Spider-Man 3“ is the concluding chapter of Marvel comic’s web swinging trilogy that began five summers ago. Most of the cast and crew have returned to the franchise except one notable exception, John Dykstra, the special effects supervisor. Thus “Spider-Man 3” feels like a thread is missing and the whole franchise might collapse within itself.

The main problem with “Spider-Man 3“ is that it suffers from a meandering plot. The three leading characters from the first film (Peter Parker (Toby McGuire), Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst), Harry Osborn (James Franco), must complete their motivational story arc. The new movie also introduces Flint Marco (Thomas Haden Church and who is destined to become “The Sandman”) and Eddie Brock, a rival journalist at the Dailey Bugle. Even Mary Jane Watson is given her own rival in the guise of Gwen Stacey (Bryce Dallas Howard), who is the opposite of everything Mary Jane.

To director Sam Raimi’s credit, many of the minor characters from “Spider-Man” and “Spider-Man 2” are given moments to shine. J.K. Simmons returns as the Dailey Bugle editor in chief, Dylan Baker as Professor Connors mentors Peter Parker on the elements of genetic science. Even Spider-Man’s creator is allowed to utter one line of dialogue. “Spider-Man 3” is not a bad movie and film makers intentions are good. “Spider-Man 3” is simply a victim of its earlier success.

The new film opens with Spidey on the top of the world. Crime in New York City is down, Peter Parker is making good grades in school and the girl of his dreams will be performing on Broadway. Peter and Mary Jane spend a wonderful romantic evening together watching a meteor shower when everything starts to go wrong.

Harry Osborn wrongly blames Peter for killing his father and vows revenge. Mary Jane loses her job and becomes jealous of her boyfriend’s popularity. Things go from bad to worst when Flint Marko escapes from jail. Peter Parker and his Aunt May (Rosemary Harris) learn Marko was involved with the murder of Ben Parker (Cliff Robertson). This revelation inspires Peter Parker to seek revenge upon Flint Marko through any means possible.

“Spider-Man 3” investigates Peter Parker's darker psyche. Peter becomes so cocksure of himself that he becomes a leisure suit Larry from Studio 54. The transformation is both comical and ugly. It is Mary Jane who receives the brunt of Peter's cruel behavior. The film falters into soap opera territory as Peter, Mary Jane and Harry resolve their love triangle.

“Spider-Man 3” has a good ending and resolve major plot points from the previous movies. While the film is a disappointment, there is still some life in the franchise. Like “Rocky Balboa,” “Spider-Man” franchise deserves to go out on a nigh note. It would be interesting to see the Shea Stadium Marriage between Peter and Mary Jane in “Spider-Man 4.”

2 comments - Leave a commentPrevious Entry Share Next Entry

Comments:

From:(Anonymous)
Date:May 28th, 2007 02:44 am (UTC)
(Link)
Bat girl here...Spider-Man 3 was ok in my opinion. It had its good and bad parts...MJ special kiss, two bad guys and bad/ good Spider-Man side. I hope that they do not make a 4th movie of Spider-Man. They should have cut out some of the parts and it might have been a better movie for it. I would watch it again after it has been on the video store shelf for a while.
From:cinemadave
Date:May 28th, 2007 03:24 am (UTC)

Bat Girl and Spider-Man

(Link)
Interesting take from another superhero
Bat girl! whose alter ego is more heroic than her moniker.

Exploring a super hero's dark side is treading a narrative tightrope. Sometimes it works and sometimes it does not. The sad thing is the good feelings I had for Peter and M.J. were snuffed out in "Spider-Man 3."